A9 dualling — can the revised programme restore public confidence?
The A9 dualling programme between Perth and Inverness is intended to improve a key Highland route. The January 2026 delivery update sets out the approach to completing the remaining sections.
A9 Dualling Project Overview
- Proposal: Completion of dualling on the remaining single-carriageway sections.
- Location: The Perth–Inverness corridor.
- Promoter’s case: Safer and more reliable journeys on a strategic route.
- Main controversy: Delays, funding decisions and confidence in delivery, rather than a simple split between supporters and opponents of dualling.
Project Status & Local Controversy
The revised programme retains an end-of-2035 completion target and describes capital funding for the remaining work. A Scottish Parliament committee linked earlier delay to a lack of agreement over funding. The missed earlier target makes transparency about procurement, construction progress and emerging risks central to public confidence.
Discussion point: What information would convince road users and local communities that the new timetable is deliverable, and how should further slippage be explained?
Infrastructure Capacity & Delivery
- Milestones: Publish section-by-section commitments, dependencies and reasons for changes in a form people can track.
- Interim safety: Which safety improvements can be delivered while communities wait for the remaining dual carriageway?
Environmental and Landscape Risks
- Landscape and habitats: How will detailed designs and construction methods limit effects on sensitive Highland settings?
- Drainage and resilience: Will the completed road and surrounding drainage remain reliable during extreme weather?
Access and Community Impacts
- Local access: How will junction design and temporary diversions serve farms, businesses and communities along the route?
- Transport choices: What parallel improvements to public transport and active travel would ensure investment also helps people who do not drive?
Sources & Further Reading
Research checked on 8 October 2026. The highlighted discussion point is an editorial question, not a quotation from a resident.
Linked item location
PH16 5BX